An Overview on Euthanasia, Resistance, and Redemption (Essay Sample)

Death and dying
The title of the Task:
Name:
Course and Section Number:
Professor:
Date of Submission:
An Overview on Euthanasia, Resistance, and Redemption. The Moralities and Politics of a Hospice by J Donald Boudreau and Margaret A Somerville.
Summary Article
What does the author have to say? How elaborate are the points?
Canada’s death and dying practices are not unique in the world; the practices are a replica of practices of other places like the USA with a few differences. Boudreau & Somerville article addresses different perspectives of physician-assisted deaths and euthanasia in USA and Canada. It sets to explore various aspects of euthanasia in other parts of the world wading into the legal and ethical perspectives on the issue. Euthanasia is the deliberate act of an individual of ending the life of the other as a way of reliving them pain. On the other hand, physician-assisted death is the prescription of lethal medication upon request by a competent patient, with an aim of ending their lives (Boudreau & Somerville, 2008).
Euthanasia and assisted death are allowed in some countries and states including Canada under certain circumstances but not at the wimp of any other person who is just willing. Dying to some opponents is a natural process that should not be left at liberty for individual to choose under whatever circumstance. On the other hand, the advocates demand that individuals should be at liberty to choose when to end their lives especially when doing so will be a great relief for them (Boudreau & Somerville, 2008).
Many factors are essential in determining if the individual will resort to euthanasia as the resort for dying despite it being legal they include one's religion, family values and personal circumstances, attitudes and values.
How trending is the issue that warrants the current research to be conducted?
Basing on the precedence of past happenings, it is worthwhile and necessary to further a study as
Boudreau and Somerville’s article provide a great insight on the issue of euthanasia and physician-assisted deaths in Canada and other countries, providing a critical view of the proposition and opposition of the same.
Critical analysis of the article
What set of facts does the author give? Are they significant enough and justifiably validated?
The article by Boudreau and Somerville on euthanasia and physician-assisted death critically addresses key issues in death and dying in Canada. Though euthanasia is allowed in Canada and some states in the United States, the article provides essential foundations on understanding how the issue is taken differently in the two countries.
According to Corr & Corr (2012), physician-induced death is allowed in some state in the United States including Oregon. In Canada, it’s illegal for one to kill intentionally through active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Canadians place some limits to euthanasia, in that only passive euthanasia is legally allowed.
What is the outlying view/opinion of the author?
The role of the family in dying processes is greatly highlighted in the article. The dying who are mostly taken care by their immediate family, making it mandatory for the family’s opinion to be sought before a decision concerning the life of their loved one is made. Family believes, religion and the wish of the dying are significant factors that are put into consideration before a decision such as passive euthanasia is reached. The practice of putting the account of the dying person family perspective before a reason is arrived at is one common practice that is found both in the United States and Canada (Corr & Corr, 2012).
Does the article exhibit any strength or weakness?
The articles deep analysis of the issue fails to capture the role of religion in the successful application of euthanasia and physician-assisted deaths. Christians and Muslims in both Canada and United States are against euthanasia and physician-assisted deaths. Their religion considers life sacred thus no one except God has the right to determine when life ends.
Do you concur with what the author alludes to? Reason being?
To a desirable degree, I second what the author entirely expresses in the article. It accounts for real time issues and concerns that are experienced a day in day out. Canada’s death and dying practices demand that the sick and the elderly are taken care of. Factors such as religion, family values and ethics play a central role in taking care of the terminally ill and how death is considered. Family members play a fundamental role in taking care of the elderly and the dying. The need to ensure that the elderly are well taken care of may make some family members resort to euthanasia when the elderly is terminally ill (Grant & Church, 2015).
Sociology setup of the research question and article at large...