Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage (Essay Sample)

Same-Sex Marriage
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Introduction
The start of civilization logged relationships between couples of the same sex normally referred to as same-sex marriage. Same sex relationships take several forms depending on complexity of interactions. Whether casual, unendorsed or ritual, same-sex marriages are a subject of laws of the land for various states from time immemorial. Acceptance of same-sex has faced opposition from devoted doctrines like Christianity. Consequently, same-sex marriages have become a ritual taboo over the years. Same-sex marriages encompass moral issues touching on rights of civilians. Recently, same-sex marriages are gaining acknowledgment across many states in the world. Several laws are being formulated to protect the rights of same sex couples. Depending on one’s sexuality or religion, same-sex marriages can be beneficial or adversarial.
Same-sex marriage is a contentious topic that has been streaming in and out of public purview in recent years. Several countries lawfully permit people of same sex freedom to marry (Bridgewater, 2013). The Netherlands, England, USA and Brazil formulate legislations permitting same-sex marriages. Legalization of same-sex marriage is a contentious issue that feasts across many institutions. Same-sex marriages draw responses from religious and non-religious circles (Spilsbury, 2012). While gays and other human rights activists support legalization of same-sex marriage, many people oppose such legalization. Whether to oppose or support gay marriages depends on personal faith and perception of morals that pertain to sexuality.
Proponents for legalization of gay marriages argue that there are benefits that accrue from such marriages (Bridgewater, 2013). Since procreation requires two opposite sex, gay couples customarily adopt children. Adoption of children is beneficial to moral society as well as relevant authorities in reducing the number of orphans (Spilsbury, 2012). There are financial rewards culminating from gay marriages. Acquisition of marriage licenses, payment of revenue taxes and reduction of tax spending on public aid programs are part of financial rewards of same-sex marriage. As a contradiction, many people tenably oppose legalizing gay marriages. Gay marriages refute definition of morality of marriage as an institution (Corvino & Gallagher, 2012). These marriages violate the purity of tradition besides rescinding family morals. Muslims and Catholics feel that gay marriages violate the beliefs of their respective faiths. However, some human rights activists argue that there are two types of marriages; religious and civil marriages. Marriage is not necessarily a religious abide but a contract that is enforceable by law.
Opinions differ among people regarding the upkeep of children by gay couples (Corvino & Gallagher, 2012). While numerous people trust that children require fathers and mothers, research conducted insinuates a different perception. A research by National Institute of Health of United States reports that girls brought up without a father-figure risk early exposure to sexual interactions (Bridgewater, 2013). Dr. Drexler contradicts such report with claims that children bred in in same-sex marriages exhibit versatility, compassion and open-mindedness. Dr. Drexler ascertains that child-care depends on standards of marital connections rather than