6 pages/≈1650 words
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Movie Review Of The Film "Whose Life Is It Anyway?" (Movie Review Sample)
This Was A Movie Review Of The Film 'whose Life Is It Anyway?' And My Task Was To Review The Basic Principles Of Medical Ethics That Could Be Depicted From This Movie.source..
Applying Bioethical Principles to Nursing Practice
Date of Submission
Whose Life is it anyway?
Summary of Plot
The film, â€˜whose life is it anywayâ€™ is a clear demonstration of the types of medical dilemmas which face healthcare practitioners on a day to day basis. It is starred by Ken Harrison who was involved in an accident and had to be admitted to hospital. Owing to his deteriorated quadriplegic condition, he sued to be allowed to end his life. The premise for this position was the fact that he could no longer pursue his passion of creating art and also he could not make love. Basically, his normal existence and style of life had been tampered with and there was no taste in life any more. This law suit elicited controversial reactions from the medical world and the society as a whole. In the end, the ultimate decision from the courts was that a patient had a moral, ethical and legal right to die according to the circumstances presented in court.
This film provides a highlight and a reflection of the salient features of rights and entitlements of patients who are trying to access healthcare. As such, it brings out the issues of beneficence, autonomy, veracity, fidelity and justice from this perspective. This paper intends to discuss all these principles in relation to the manner in which they were brought out in the film and analyze whether the film effectively touched on critical facts associated with these principles.
The film cast the starring Ken Harrison to be at all times static because of the paralysis and in deep pain. The quadriplegic condition had deprived him of all sorts of enjoyment in life. Therefore, it was incumbent upon the doctors to recommend the most beneficial medical treatment or advice at that point in time. This proposition would at the same time factor in the non-malfeasance principle; such that while purporting to help the patient, they do not proceed to cause him immeasurable harm.
After being involved in the accident, Ken became a Quadrupled paraplegic. The prognosis was that he could never walk again and at the same time, he could never use his arms and hands. The doctors also examined his situation and found out that he was suffering from depression which had affected his thinking. Therefore, presented with the question of whether to allow Ken end his life, they had an obligation of making a decision that not only helps him but also does not cause him pain.
One option here was to make the most aggressive decision, which they actually did. They opted to recommend that Ken could not access Euthanasia because his condition was not terminal enough to warrant such an extreme measure. One of the probable consequences of this decision is that letting Ken Harrison go home in that condition would actually culminate in more depression because he clearly had nothing else to do with his life. On the other hand, the patient gave the doctors an option of making their work easier by agreeing to take his life. This would imply that the patientâ€™s life ends regardless of any prospects ahead. Instead, they would have relieved him of the feeling of self-hate and depression. The incapacitation had overwhelmed him and in my opinion they would have budged in at this time. From a utilitarian perspective, this would have been the best decision because it bears the greatest common good with it.
The issue of patient autonomy can also be clearly depicted from the film. The later stages of the film depict a tussle between the opinions of the patient and those of the doctors attending to him. On his part, Ken Harrison simply wanted to die. He was devastated by the fact that he was immobile and totally incapacitated. He also de...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
- Film Critic Erin BrockovichDescription: Primarily, this paper reviews a movie called Erin Brockovich. The review is unique in its approach and uses a research design perspective to analyze the movie....1 page/≈275 words| 3 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Movie Review |
- Movie Review Of The Film "Whose Life Is It Anyway?"Description: Movie Review Of The Film 'whose Life Is It Anyway?' And My Task Was To Review The Basic Principles Of Medical Ethics That Could Be Depicted From This Movie....6 pages/≈1650 words| No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Movie Review |