Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
You are here: HomeReaction PaperLiterature & Language
3 pages/≈825 words
3 Sources
Literature & Language
Reaction Paper
English (U.S.)
MS Word
Total cost:
$ 10.8

Do You Think the Statement, 'I Think, Therefore I Am' By Rene Descartes is True? Why? (Reaction Paper Sample)


the task was to discuss whether in my opinion the famous cogito by rene Descartes "i think, therefore, i am" was valid or not. In the sample paper i attempt to explain the reasoning behind rene's proposition and conclude that he was right to state so.


Do You Think the Statement, “I Think, Therefore I Am” By Rene Descartes is True? Why?
Institution Affiliation
Do You Think the Statement, “I Think, Therefore I Am” By Rene Descartes is True? Why?
Rene Descartes’ famous Cogito, “I think, therefore I am,” has been subject to intense scrutiny. The famous French philosopher formulated this hypothesis in his quest to establish whether anything was indubitable and would serve as a perfectly certain foundation for other existing knowledge. Psychologists contend that human beings are intelligent creatures, inferring the existence of things, mostly from their sense perception. Their high cognitive functionality allows them to perceive and fathom their surrounding environment. However, Descartes realized that when subjected to scrutiny, such postulations could be challenged. Therefore, he decided to embrace a skeptical stance towards all knowledge. His inference was that since he doubted his existence, then it meant that he indeed existed, as it would have felt preposterous to be able to doubt and not exist (Dicker, 2013). Descartes’ certitude holds true since it underscores the fact that thoughts exist and that they are distinctive to the thinking being. The perceptive aptitudes of this thinking being help to determine their character, conduct, and actions. This paper will offer supporting arguments in an attempt to validate Descartes’ Cogito.
To begin with, this formulation by Descartes has been widely criticized as lacking logical validity. Several prominent philosophers, for example, Soren Kierkegaard, contend that his logic only proves the existence of thoughts but fails to substantiate the existence of the thinking subject. Echoing similar sentiments are Russel and Nietzsche (Sullivan, 2009), who debunk the conclusion that the subject that does the thinking and thus exists is the “I” in the statement. Their rationale is that such metaphysical arguments are marred by grammatical limitations, which in this case leads to the inference of the thinking agent as the “I”. Instead, the only logical certainty in Descartes' reasoning is the indubitable existence of thoughts, but not "a self". While all the above arguments are cogent, it is necessary to discern that Descartes’ Cogito requires no separate entity to remain coherent...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • Ethnographers Analytical Essay and Field Journal (Malacca Trip)
    Description: Ethnographers Analytical Essay and Field Journal (Malacca Trip) Literature and Language Reaction Paper...
    8 pages/≈2200 words| APA | Literature & Language | Reaction Paper |
  • Smoking
    Description: Accurate research and assessing the history of smoking is significant in the development of estimates concerning the cessation from smoking habits...
    5 pages/≈1375 words| 3 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Reaction Paper |
  • Individual Project
    Description: The client wanted me to submit a final expository essay that blends the viewpoints from Units 3 and 4, that he had provided...
    1 page/≈275 words| APA | Literature & Language | Reaction Paper |
Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!