Barriers to OMC Uptake in Australia (Research Paper Sample)

Barriers to OMC Uptake in Australia
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Department/Institutional Affiliation
Course Code and Name
Instructor's Name
Due Date
Barriers to OMC Uptake in Australia
The use of novel technology to improve healthcare access can make a significant contribution to health outcomes. Among these technologies, online medical consultations (OMC) have significantly advanced in its capacity to extend access to healthcare services or provide previously unavailable benefits. It is believed that increased access to healthcare services would result in improved health outcomes and more cost-effective service delivery. Healthcare providers are using information and communication technologies (ICTs) to improve their services (ICTs). The services provided by the OMC allow patients who reside in rural places to connect with health care specialists who are present in their immediate vicinity. In this case, the patient calls the healthcare professional to schedule a follow-up appointment or consult about their current health condition. This kind of communication is referred to as e-consultation in the technical community. A health care service that uses information and communications technologies (ICTs) to allow patients to exchange, transmit, and communicate data or information in real-time with a care provider, typically a physician in the clinical setting, is defined in this article as online medical consultation (OMC) services. For their part, external and internal variables might have a favorable or adverse effect on the utilization of e-consultation services. External aspects include both the surroundings and the system itself, while internal variables include, among other things, user behavior and motivation, which are all essential considerations.
For decades, proponents of contemporary technology-assisted delivery of health care have proclaimed the advantages of OMC. One of OMC's strengths is its capacity to provide previously unavailable healthcare services or broaden access to previously inaccessible healthcare services. It is believed that increased access to healthcare services would lead to improved health outcomes as well as more cost-effective service delivery in the future. It has long been thought that OMC may assist in ameliorating the poor health and inequitable access to healthcare that rural Australians suffer from as a result of their remote location. The fact that OMC has so many potential benefits is that it is consistently underused. Adoption is hampered by a number of factors, which are well acknowledged.
The adoption of the OMC practice may be influenced by the facilitators and barriers that are experienced during its use. While facilitators are considered good impacts, impediments are deemed negative influences. Influencing factors might come from either the outside or the inside. External factors include both the environment in which the system is used and the system itself, whilst internal variables include the user's behavior and motivation while using the system. External variables and internal variables are both important. A better understanding of the facilitators and barriers to HOHC use is required as a result.
Almathami et al. (2020) employed a mixed-methods approach to study the obstacles and facilitators of real-time, online consultation at patients' homes (OMC). The researchers conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching digital libraries for articles on online health consultation that were empirical studies, and then presented their findings to the participants. They decided to undertake a qualitative content analysis to understand better the hurdles and facilitators to HOHC system adoption and the effectiveness and patient satisfaction with the system in question. According to the study's findings, several factors contribute to patients' apprehension about online consultations, including a lack of comprehension, a lack of familiarity with technology, and a reluctance to try new things. As a result, it is vital to stress to patients that they are already acquainted with the system in order to reduce their resistance to it. According to the publications reviewed, users who were previously familiar with similar and widely used video conferencing technology showed no apprehension about participating in online discussions. Patients' prior treatment experiences and their acquaintance with physicians may aid in minimizing their technology aversion. According to the study's findings, individuals who had previously received treatment for a specific health issue or were familiar with the doctor who treated them during face-to-face consultations were more open to and encouraged to use HOHC systems than other patients. Among the most frequently reported barriers to the online consultation, according to Almathami et al. (2020), are a lack of organizational support in terms of legislation, policy, and money, as well as a lack of financial resources. This is because health insurance companies do not fully support online consultation. The absence of hospital assistance in integrating HOHC with patients' health records, ensuring complete record documentation and promoting cross-synchronization with other system platforms all contribute to the slow progress of HOHC implementation.
Positive patient opinions of the system's privacy and security—the feeling of privacy while conducting the online consultation at home—can aid in HOHC adoption. Despite technical attempts to ensure the security and confidentiality of patients' data, some patients raise concerns about the system's security and privacy. Patients' perceptions of HOHC privacy and security are subjective; as a result, they may serve as both a facilitator and a barrier, influencing their understanding of the HOHC system positively or negatively. Almathami et al. (2020) concluded that a stable broadband connection is critical for OMC. Broadband access and digital literacy have been identified as critical impediments to OMC implementation. While national data on internet access indicate gaps, particularly in rural regions and among seniors, these averages conceal enormous heterogeneity, particularly in urban neighborhoods. Almathami et al. (2020) noted Internet speed as a factor affecting the HOHC's quality in 20 investigations. In all, 15 of 20 studies (75 percent) indicated that a sluggish Internet connection during the consultation resulted in poor video and audio quality, connection loss, and participant irritation. On the other side, fast Internet speed was identified in five of the twenty studies (25%) as having a beneficial effect on the quality of communication between patients and care providers. Three research revealed that poor wireless and 3G network signal quality impacted the quality of online consultations. For example, the house interior and weather conditions have an effect on the wireless and 3G network signals, reducing their strength.
Even if physical impediments to OMC adoption are overcome, long-standing skepticism in the healthcare system among certain marginalized communities may have an effect on OMC adoption. According to the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), Whites are more likely than other minority groups to assess their healthcare as outstanding (34%) and are less likely to view it as fair or bad (26%-28%). (Barriers To OMC Adoption, 2021). Additionally, although 66% of White patients report receiving online access to their electronic medical information, fewer Black (57%) Hispanic (46%) and Asian (53%) patients report receiving such offers (Barriers To OMC Adoption, 2021). Additionally, patients express worries about digital interactions with providers, privacy and security issues, and skepticism about their doctor's ability to give an appropriate diagnosis using OMC. They may think that when OMC is emphasized, they will lose their personal connection with their provider. Health systems and OMC platforms must address these issues by informing patients about state and federal privacy laws, as well as rules requiring OMC providers to deliver the same level of care through OMC as they do in-person.
Practitioners of OMC have the ability to provide medical services to patients and other healthcare professionals beyond geographical borders, partnering with them to exchange clinical expertise. Gajarawala and Pelkowski (2021) argue that the lack of multistate licensing poses a barrier to OMC since practitioners must obtain and maintain licenses in a number of different jurisdictions (together with the related medical education and financial commitments(Gajarawala & Pelkowski, 2021). Medical boards would maintain their authority to license and discipline providers under the terms of the agreement. On the other hand, these providers would exchange information and practices that are necessary to maintain their licenses and comply with relevant rules and regulations. It is not applicable to nurse practitioners (who are licensed by state nursing boards rather than by state medical boards as a result of this agreement. Because state regulations and practice authority differ from one another, nurse practitioners (NPs) face higher challenges than physicians or physician assistants. Note that certain standards have been temporarily revised in particular locations as a consequence of COVID-19, which is important to understand. The most up-to-date information on OMC practice regulations should be obtained from the state board of nursing in which the NP is licensed. 
According to Gajarawala and Pelkowski (2021), OMC practice is more vulnerable to privacy and security risks than face-to-face meetings and communications. Despite the fact that the vast majority of OMC sy...