The Poor Are More Vulnerable To Diabetes Than The Rich (Research Paper Sample)

THE POOR ARE MORE VULNERABLE TO DIABETES THAN THE RICH
Student Name
Course Title
Instructor
Date
ABSTRACT
This paper looks into the fact that rich people are less likely to get diabetic than poor people because they have easier access to more different varieties of fresh produce. The cases of diabetes in the world are on the rise, and they are even rampant in the United States. Food inadequacy and diabetes can coincide, and are altogether related in a number of studies done. Nevertheless, this does not really mean they are causally connected to each other. Both food insecurity and diabetes can be autonomous outcomes of low incomes and the subsequent absence of access to sufficient food supply or worries of deprivation. All the more particularly, diabetes among food-deprived individuals – and among low-income people – happens to a large extent since they are liable to the same frequently difficult social changes as other people who earn higher incomes. In low-income cities, there are limited outlets for fresh food produce as opposed to high-income neighborhoods. This leads to most low-income individuals ending up in junk and low-calorie foods. Financially stable people have a better chance of affording to subscribe to recreational and physical activity facilities and thus burn the extra fat that would cause diabetes. Among low-income earners, food supply is insufficient and thus they may not afford fresh produce as do high-income earners. The cases of diabetes have significantly risen in low-income earners. This is an exact opposite of how the situation used to be in previous years. These days rich people are less likely to get diabetic than poor people because they have easier access to more different varieties of fresh produce.
INTRODUCTION
The health of the population is impacted on not only by the financial well-being of people and family units but also by the city and financial essentialness of their assortments. Individuals not able to stand to live in more advantageous, more alluring ranges frequently battle with difficulties identified with a variety of group level health-related4. These variables are as discussed below.
Access to adequate food among low-income earners tends to be very difficult. They mostly have constrained access to nutritious food sources, for example, general stores that offer crisp and create other invigorating food alternatives. They will probably have shops and restaurants offering junk and fatty fast foods. Individuals with low incomes have a limited access to fresh produce and recreational facilities thus hindering active physical living7. Their neighborhoods are frequently less helpful for cycling or walking to class, work, or shopping.
Low-salary and minority groups are all the more often focused on the consumption of tobacco, liquor, and fatty foods. Individuals with constrained facilities encounter higher rates of deficient and flimsy housing and presentation to indoor drugs. They regularly face hindrances to moving to a better neighborhood with more satisfying accommodation services. Open transportation is regularly insufficient to empower inhabitants to drive to work, to locate a better employment, or to access a grocery store, a good healthcare service provider. According to Power, O'Connor, Orlet and Hughes, low-income neighborhoods have unavoidable conditions to obesity and diabetes6. This diminishes the effectiveness of social facilities such as health centers. Trade strapped schools out low-salary neighborhoods may have sub-par facilities and crumbled structures. Low-asset neighborhoods frequently confront a deficiency of work openings, and essential care suppliers and astounding clinical offices.
Low-income earners are more averse to have the capacity to manage the cost of living in neighborhoods that are free of toxins4. In addition, may of need live close bustling roadways with vehicle outflows, processing plants with surging smokestacks and water discharges, transport terminals, and different air and water contamination sources. Such environments also demoralize person on foot action and such practices as redlining, which served to disconnect and isolate minority groups. Open arrangements have truly resulted in the neglect of these areas by investors to, thus creating persevering isolation, less financial gateways, and expanding crime. To some degree, pay and riches straightforwardly bolster better wellbeing on the grounds that wealthier individuals can bear the facilities that ensure and enhance good health. Rather than some low-salary individuals, they have a tendency to have occupations that are more steady and adaptable; give great advantages, like medical cover, paid leave, and professional healthcare programs; and thus have less word related perils2.
According to Powers, Scott and Frazão, more wealthy individuals have more expendable wage and can all the more effortlessly manage the cost of restorative care and a sound way of life—advantages that likewise stretch out to their kids5. Low-income population faces higher rates of food insecurity. They do not easily afford regular, nutritious meals. These meals tend to be less pocket-friendly as they are expensive and they cannot afford them. This prompts them to go for fast foods and high-carbohydrate options which is why they are more stricken by diabetes.. These difficult conditions of living often preclude active recreational opportunities for regular exercises. In other cases, the cost of gym subscriptions and in others these facilities are often prohibitive. Additionally, food insecurity may cause financial and emotional pressure to families, including children. The stress and depression they undergo may make them gain too much weight and eventually diabetes5.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From the analysis of variance that I used to analyze the data, it was clear that in the more deprived zones of America, fewer outlets are offering proper nutrition, and more nutritious food is more costly in these regions than in the less deprived regions. I compared the level of income in the more deprived cities like 90007 Los Angeles; there were a whopping 456 deaths from diabetes recorded. This, on a very basic level, constrains the diet decisions that low-income individuals can make, along these lines advancing unfortunate ways of life, and, eventually become diabetic.
The observation additionally contended that diabetes frequently happens in individuals from less wealthy foundations in light of 'nourishment instability’ or an absence of general, reliable access to food. This is evident from Norco, California where the level of income is high, and thus only eight deaths were recorded in 2012. Not knowing where or when their next supper will originate from, numerous poorer individuals will over-expend nourishment when it is accessible. This circumstance can turn into a cycle of over-utilization in light of frailty which can at the last prompt to heftiness.
Mann-Whitney U-test that I used to compare the cities with low income with those of high income showed that low-wage neighborhoods most times lack supermarkets and groceries where they can buy a number of natural produce such as whole grains, vegetables, and low-fat dairy products. The compiled produce survey shows that those families with high incomes can afford to buy healthy products such as bitter melon and cactus juice. Rather, occupants, particularly those with a poor transport network, might be forced to shop at corner stores where low-fat products are sold. Research on locational variations in food show that those inhabitants with better access to general stores and fresh produce live a healthy life free of diabetes
RESULTS
From face-to-face interview with those who were diabetic, I realized that the individuals who ate less or skipped meals to extend their food programs increase the risk of diabetes because they overeat when they get food. From Graph 1 below, cycles of food insecurity or hardship can also lead to careless eating practices. The careless eating practices include eating at the fast food outlets on a regular basis due to the low level of income. This is a big risk of becoming diabetic.
Table1: Table of the Relationship between Income Levels and Diabetes Vulnerability
Zip codeCityAverage Income per HouseholdNo. of Deaths from Diabetes92544 HYPERLINK "http://zipatlas.com/us/ca/hemet.htm" Hemet, California$37,086.027992860Norco, California$116,658890058Los Angeles$18,72938990007Los Angeles$17,64445690049Los Angeles$33,52026793108Santa Barbara, California$101,5751695971Quincy, California$36,938254
Graph 1: Graph of Percentage Death Rates in Adults against their Income Category


Apparently, in low-income neighborhoods, there are not enough physical and recreational facilities than higher income-earning counterparts. As a result, it becomes difficult to lead a physically dynamic way of life. From the findings in Table 1, it is clear that constrained access to such facilities is a hazard figure for diabetes.
From Table 1, we can see that those individuals earning low income are more likely to succumb to diabetes. There is developing proof that inaccessibility to fresh produce is connected to vulnerability to diabetes. Further, numerous studies indicate that high income earner are generallymore physically fit that low-salary ones. This is not because the financial ability of the low-income earners compels them to stick to food alone and forget about physical activity.
DISCUSSION
Levels of income and wealth are directly related to an individual’s health and longevity. The higher is one’s level of income; the lower is their probability of becoming diabetic. Further research shows that Americans with low income levels are more affected than those with high wages1. In sp...