Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing in the UK Healthcare Environment (Research Paper Sample)

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING
by (Name)
The Name of the Class (Course)
Professor (Tutor)
The Name of the School (University)
The City and State where it is located
The Date
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing
The competitive and dynamic United Kingdom (UK) healthcare environment necessitates care experts accountable for offering efficient care. Novel evidence is constantly evolving in clinical and nursing settings. Augmented patient anticipations and consumer pressure place an even larger emphasis on the need for nurses to provide accurate, evidence-based care in their everyday practice (Linsley, Kane, and Barker, 2019, p. 3). Mental health nurses’ assessment and use of best evidence infuse self-reliance in the patient with the prognosis, leading to optimal upshots. Literature contends that the execution of evidence-based practice (EBP) permits healthcare providers to deliver care based on facts and inquiries rather than myths, obsolete guides and books, advice from associates, or guesses.
Section 1: Role of EBP
EBP incorporates the best accessible scientific evidence with the best existing empirical evidence. It utilizes a meticulous tactic to deliberate external and internal impacts on practice and motivates critical thinking in the prudent use of such evidence when caring for a population or individual patients (Linsley, Kane, and Barker, 2019, p. 5). EBP offers an organized way for care experts to efficiently utilize non-research and existing research evidence to establish best practices and deliver high-quality, safe care. According to Aveyard and Sharp (2017, p. 15), the approach informs and supports administrative, medical, and educational choice-making. The evidence-based choice-making motivates mental health nurses to cross-examine practice and establish the interpositions ready to be executed in medical practice.
Numerous EBP frameworks are utilized in healthcare, including the conceptual model, the Conduct and Utilization of Research in Nursing (CURN), the planned action theory model, and the Normalization process model. The conceptual framework was developed from an evidence blend of the disseminations of quality enhancement, novelties, and diffusions of experiential and hypothetical literature. It contains several components, including system readiness and antecedents for transformation, assimilation, adopter, execution process, novelty, influence and communication, and linkage (Rycroft-Malone and Bucknall, 2010, pp. 39-40). The framework's proponents advocate that the model can be utilized as an assistant memoir for considering the different facets of the sophistication of innovation adoption.
CURN is among the oldest EBP models. It was established coherently from the results of a huge project piloted in a health facility in the UK (Rycroft-Malone and Bucknall, 2010, p. 40). The framework's objective is to guide practice transformation. It is problem-focused and assumes a logistic perception of transforming practice. The planned action theory model contains several phases whose order relies on different circumstances (Rycroft-Malone and Bucknall, 2010, p. 43). They include problem identification, factual proposal development, performance analysis, strategy selection or development, measures to transform practice, execution plan implementation, and continuous adaptation and assessment.
The normalization process model can be utilized to delineate how intricate interventions become entrenched in practice. Developed from the scrutiny of experiential surveys, it consists of four aspects that can enable or hinder normalization. They include interpersonal assimilation, interactional feasibility, contextual incorporation, and skill set practicability (Rycroft-Malone and Bucknall, 2010, pp. 43). The model's proponents advocate that it can be utilized as an applied concept to develop theories