Medicare for All-Annotated Bibliography (Annotated Bibliography Sample)

Medicare for All-Annotated Bibliography
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Blake, V. (2020). Health Care Civil Rights under Medicare for All. Hastings Law Journal, 72. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=law_faculty
Valarie Blake’s article appearing in the Hastings Law Journal explores the right to healthcare under the guarantee of healthcare civil rights. Blake, a law professor at the West Virginia University College of Law, understands the legal implications of healthcare access. Therefore, she provides credible arguments for the implementation of Medicare for all under the consideration of civil rights. Blake argues that the passing of Medicare for All helps to eliminate healthcare inequalities that have long-plagued the national healthcare system. The inequalities are notable in age differences, sex, socioeconomic status, and racial differences. Therefore, the researcher provides that Medicare for all will allow for better access to healthcare services. Further, she also asserts that healthcare services under the program will reduce the severity of chronic illnesses and lower the government's long-term spending on medical services. Through reference to civil laws and legislations, Blake's paper provides critical support for the arguments in support of Medicare for all in the United States. The paper also provides an alternative view to the debate through linking to human rights and civil guarantees.
Bernstein, J. (2020). Not the Last Word: Medicare for All is not enough. Clinical Orthopedics and related research, 478(2), 216 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438128/
In his article, Joseph Barnstein (2020), Medicare for All is not Enough, provides counter-arguments against the institutionalization of Medicare for All. The author is a clinical orthopedist with a long-standing history in medical research. This provides his credibility and authority to contribute to the topic. Bernstein argues that Medicare for all is likely to increase the rate of taxation for the citizens and increase the cost of living. Further, he also argues that such an approach will be unfair to some citizens. His social examination rests on the idea that Medicare for all wi