Murder on the Orient Express: Free Will, Fate And Determinism Theories (Coursework Sample)
the task talked about free will theory. it determined characters in a movie acting from a theory of free will, fate, and determinism.source..
Free Will Theories
The theories of free will establish the different possibility of ways or activities that are unimpeded in the society. It depicts concepts of judgments that elaborate one's sins, responsibilities, and guilt that shows how one's actions are freely chosen. The capacity of prohibition, advice, and persuasion, also associates with the art of free will in the contemporary society at large. Moreover, the choices we make that determine our outcomes predetermined by our experience and events facilitates the essence of free will which creates the art of determinism. Therefore, according to the ancient Greeks, determinism conceives free will, which is inconsistent making it incompatible. The essence of determinism concerning incompatibility is known as incompatibilism which claims that if determinism is wrong then free will is possible and when free will is not possible through hard determinism then the determinism is right or correct in the philosophical world of the Greeks. On the contrary, most compatibilists during classical times stressed that for free will to suffice then determinism is essential (Edelstein, Wenzel, & Salcido, 2015).
In this regard, this paper will talk about a movie known as Murder on the Orient Express filmed and released in the late last year of 2017. The cinema displays an intelligent detective known as Hercule Poirot who was known for his talent to solve crimes of theft, murder, or corruption at large. The movie starts with him solving a crime in Syria as he travels to Stamboul the following day. In Stamboul, he meets his longtime friend Bouc at the hotel before he is served with a note of solving a crime back in England. Mr. Bouc helps him with a ticket on the Orient Express train that leaves in the next hour. In the train, Poirot meets Ratchett, an established businessman who wants to employ him as his bodyguard since he believed that people especially Italians are threatening him. In the train, there was Mrs. Hubbard, Mary Debenham whom they met on his way to Stamboul, Colonel Arbuthnot, Princess Dragomiroff, Count Andrenyi, McQueen, and Sonia, Hardman, Pilar, and the doctor among others (Charles, 2018).
The prominent businessman Mr. Ratchett is assassinated in the train as Bouc begs detective Poirot to solve the case before he reaches his destination. Upon the death of Mr. Ratchett, any passenger in the train might account for the end of the businessman. The above narrative raises the question whether it was through free will, determinism, fate, or the combination of the theories as it is in the context. The determination by the detective to find the killer would promote justice in the train thus anyone might be held accountable for the murder. Poirot interrogates McQueen who was his accountant and took care of his business activities. The detective perceives that the case of Mr. Ratchette relates to the Armstrong case and that the real dead's man name was not Ratchett but Cassetti. Poirot believed that Daisy Armstrong's death was in Mr. Ratchett's hands and that he was to die for it according to one of the threatening letters. At first, the essence of determinism stems out through McQueen who Poirot perceived that he is the prime suspect since he wanted to remain with Ratchett's wealth. The claims that McQueen killed Ratchett shows the art of determinism is right, and therefore the essence of doing it on a free will is wrong according to the movie.
Additionally, McQueen wanted to settle his father's debts and revenge against Ratchett known as Cassetti who ruined his father's life. It is a speculation of hard determinism since the above narrative is of free will is not possible because he could not have been the only one who could have stabbed Cassetti twelve times in the chest. The detective later accuses Mary Debenham of planning the murder of Ratchett seems confident that he recognized Sonia Armstrong's sister in the train. In this regard, the art if free will is achieved since the detective stems out to describe how Debenham drugged Ratchett. At the time of Armstrong tragedy, Debenham was living in the Armstrong house because she loved Daisy Armstrong. Consequently, the free will theory stems out when Debenham said categorically, “Cassetti was a pig, and he deserved to die…” (Charles, 2018) Upon her words that free will is at least possible since she killed the businessman. Free will as defined earlier i
- Women's SexualityDescription: Sexuality refers the differences that exhibit in living organisms in terms of sex and gender, which in many cases is seen as an erogenous practices...2 pages/≈550 words| 3 Sources | APA | Visual & Performing Arts | Coursework |
- Analysis of West Side Story and Describing the ExperienceDescription: The park was fantastic and had many beautiful buildings. There were a small cafe and an entrance leading to the theater center. ...2 pages/≈550 words| No Sources | APA | Visual & Performing Arts | Coursework |
- Jazz History Description: In the jazz documentary by Ken Burns, a specific focus was on part 6 chapter 20, entitled A reason for Living-Duke Ellington...2 pages/≈550 words| No Sources | APA | Visual & Performing Arts | Coursework |