The Philosophy: Justice and Laws Coursework Research (Coursework Sample)

Justice and Laws
Question1
The arguments that Robert Bork presented following his opposition of the Civil Rights Act included: the existence of some unexpressed and hidden natural law which could not be uprooted. Though the law was to help control discrimination of races, Bork could clearly tell that there are some untouched powers and agencies that had to maintain their stand on racial discrimination. Therefore, to him the civil rights law was not a way forwards to curb racial differences in the business sector. Also, the judges selected to deal with the crimes were almost from one tribe, hence this was irrational. This according to Robert Bork could lead to lack of association to the clients whom the judges would serve. And how can one help an individual who he does not associate with? The Negroes therefore still remained in their problems of facing injustice. The civil right law according to Bork was much to compel the Negroes service compared to the whites. This was a deprivation of the Negroes’ liberty which was contrary to their beliefs and morals. Actually, I think he expressed a direct concern for the inaction of the civil rights law. Though the institution was to help the Negroes, the institutors however blackmailed the activity and the whole process still turned to benefit the whites. This law still encouraged racial discrimination, just as he says.
Question 2
Martin Luther King defines an unjust law in various ways in his letter. First, he claims an unjust law to involve unfairness in terms of the testing towards getting registered. This sector of being registered to be an American more so to the blacks was tricky and many Negroes were pissed off towards getting their citizenship. Also, second, unjust law according to him could be seen clearly because all the judges were white men and this first showed much of favoritism and injustice. Third, the publishing of names in the poll tax only comprising the whites signifying unjust law. This made many of the senate seats to be comprising of the white people. The black remained poor and not allowed in the poll tax. This laws are not different from the Selma fil laws that also promoted much of racial discrimination. We find Martin Luther King pressing forward from Selma to Montgomery so as to complain from President Johnson against the law of having only the whites to vote in the polls. The laws even led to human rights fights in some areas like Alabama City which became a ground for battle for suffrage. These even showed the examples that tended to meet King’s criteria for instance, seeking to stand for the rights of the Negroes and at the end their effort considered and the blacks could vote. To add on this criteria, King could have also started to campaign for the slotting of the blacks in the polls in seats of the senate, which they lacked a good representation.
Question 3
In his letter, King explain effectives of nonviolent action and...