Ethics Issue (Essay Sample)
The instructions were on ethical practice by court prosecutors. The paper discusses how prosecutors ought to behave when handling criminal cases. It talks about how prosecutors should help in making the accused have a just hearing and determination of his or her case.source..
There is always a well-organized justice system in any well-organized and stable government. Justice is one of the key aims of any government, and it plays a major role of ensuring that sanity remains within the country, and in the world; for international justice systems. There must be a prosecutor in all the courts, who play the role of proving that the suspects are guilty. Prosecutors should ensure that they perform their roles of prosecution under strict guidance of ethics (Braswell et al., 2012).
Criminal prosecutors have the roles of carrying out investigations, and availing themselves before the courts with the aim of proving that a suspect committed the crime(s) as charged. They are also entitled to start legal proceedings against a suspect. Prosecutors can also decide to seek an out-of-court solution to a problem when the suspects take the liabilities of the crimes committed. This may avoid trials because the prosecutors may only fine the suspects and leave them free. In an adversarial system of justice, the defendants have the choice of either choosing to provide evidence for their defense, or remaining silent. This is because the evidence they provide may result in their conviction when the court discovers that it was faulty. If the defendants choose not to provide any evidence for their defense, the prosecution will have no chance of asking the defendants questions. This set up of court proceedings interferes a lot with the roles of prosecutors because they depend on asking the defendants questions in order to win most cases (Braswell et al., 2012).
Every prosecutor must prosecute a suspect when he/she is satisfied that the suspect committed the crime. This level of satisfaction is only realizable when there is sufficient evidence, which proves that the suspect was involved in the crime. Any prosecutor who makes the step of prosecuting a suspect without sufficient evidence is unethical, and only shows that there is something personal between the prosecutor and the suspect. The prosecutor can only prosecute a suspect without adequate evidence when he/she wants to settle personal differences between him/her and the suspect (Knafla, 2002).
The prosecutor should make several considerations before charging someone in a court of law. He/she should consider the presence of witnesses. It is not ethical to accuse an individual of a crime when there is no wit...
- Law Enforcement Productivity and Crime Triangle TheoryDescription: The essay was about an evaluation on how to enhance productivity and a brief analysis of crime triangle theory....7 pages/≈1925 words| APA | Law | Essay |
- 2795, Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization ActDescription: 2795, Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act Law Essay...2 pages/≈550 words| 3 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
- Research and Describe Is the Death Penalty Effective?Description: The essay required one to argue out whether the death penalty in the united states has been effective or not as a deterrent method...3 pages/≈825 words| 3 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |