Compare and contrast Machiavelli and Wollstonecraft’s views on the meaning of virtue. What are the implications of their perspectives for political and social life? (Essay Sample)
Mr. writer, please use my materials as well as yours.
The essay contains 2500 words.
So 10% pre-paid 80% development and 10% completion.
Please, write more words on the content than on the Bibliography and references.
Please write in the academic language.
Easy to read.
I'm giving you books that you can use:
N. Machiavelli The Prince (Il Principe) (1998) Secondary sources: BBC (2013) “Imagine: Who is afraid of Machiavelli?” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMkt1Vq7tJ4 M S Ali (2015) ‘Morality and politics with reference to Machiavelli are the prince’, European Scientific Journal, 06/2015, Volume 11. 17.V. Barnett (2006) `Niccolo Machiavelli –the Cunning Critic of Political Reason’ History Review –available on History Today website http://www.history today. Com/Vincent-Barnett/niccolo-machiavelli-%E2%80%93-cunning-critic-political-reason. Berlin `The Originality of Machiavelli’ in Against the Current: essay in the history of ideas(1979) [digitized on the WOLF page of this module]P. Curry and O. Zarate Introducing Machiavelli (2000) 741.5/CURA. Edwards and J. Townshend (eds) (2002). Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: from Machiavelli to Marx 320.01/ INTT. Lukes `Lionizing Machiavelli’ American Political Science Review 95 (3), 2001, 561-75.H. Mansfield (1996). Machiavelli’s Virtue 320.1092/MANA. McGuire `Not economical with the truth: Machiavelli as simple, direct and straightforward’, Psychotherapy and Political International 4 (2), 2006, 142-49 http://online library.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ppi.98/pdf (Review article)R. McMahon (ed.) (2008) Machiavelli’s the Prince: Bold-Faced Principles on Tactics, Power and Politics (Sterling publishing –available on Google Books) C. Nederman (2009) Machiavelli: a beginner’s guide. Oxford: Oneworld.C. Nederman (2014) ‘Machiavelli’, Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/machiavelli/ [Accessed 16th January 2016]Special issue of The Review of Politics 75 (4) 2013 –various articles. Skinner Machiavelli: a very short introduction (2000). OUP.Q. Skinner (1981) Machiavelli. OUP.D Tillyris (2014)'Learning How Not to Be Good': Machiavelli and the Standard Dirty Hands Thesis’, Ethical theory and moral practice, Vol. 18.1, pp. 61-74.M. Viroli, (2014) Redeeming the Prince: The Meaning of Machiavelli's Masterpiece, Princeton: Princeton University Press.N. Warburton et al (eds). (2000). Reading political philosophy: Machiavelli to Mill.
M Wollstonecraft A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1992 Dent ed., 1982 Penguin ed.)Online full text http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/mw-vind.htmlR Abbey `Back to the future: marriage as friendship in the thought of Mary Wollstonecraft’ Hypatia14 (3) 1999S Berges The Routledge Guidebook to Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman(2013) E-book at https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780203094181M Brody `Mary Wollstonecraft: Sexuality and Women’s Rights’ in D Spender (ed.) FeministTheories (1982) D Coole Women in Political Theory (2nd ed. 1993) ch. 5A Curthoys `Mary Wollstonecraft revisited’ Humanities Research XV1 (2): (2010): 29-48.M Ferguson `Mary Wollstonecraft and the problematic of slavery’, Feminist Review 42 (1992) M Gatens `The oppressed state of my sex: Wollstonecraft on reason, feeling and equality’ in M Shanley and C Pateman (eds) Feminist interpretations and political theory (1991)L Gordon Vindication: a Life of Mary Wollstonecraft, London: Virago(2006) 305.42/WOL S Gubar `Feminist misogyny: Mary Wollstonecraft and the paradox of “it takes one to know one”’Feminist Studies 20 (3) 1994
6P Hirsch `Mary Wollstonecraft: a problematic legacy’ in C Campbell Orr Wollstonecraft’s Daughters: womanhood in England and France 1780-1920 (1996) 305.42094/WOLRM Janes `On the reception of Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Women’ Journal of the History of Ideas 39 (2) 1978CL Johnson The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (2002) Ch. 9, 826.3/WOL/CAME Nixon Mary Wollstonecraft: her Life and Times (1971) ch. 7, 305.420941/NIX M Poovey The proper lady and the woman writer: ideology as style in the work of MaryWollstonecraft (1984) B Taylor `Mary Wollstonecraft and the wild wish of early feminism’ History Workshop Journal 33 (1992)M Tims Mary Wollstonecraft: a social pioneer (1976) ch. 8, 305.420941/TIM M Walters `The Rights and Wrongs of Women: Mary Wollstonecraft, Harriet Martineau, Simone de Beauvoir’ in J Mitchell and A Oakley (eds) The Rights and Wrongs of Women (1976)P Welch web page on Wollstonecraft http://pers-www.wlv.ac.uk / -le1810/woll.htm
I would ask the writer to give up work on time and even one day before the deadline in order to check and verify essay.
In case of something not understanding please contact me, this essay is very important I have to have 70-80% to pass.
Compare and contrast Machiavelli and Wollstonecraft’s views on the meaning of virtue. What are the implications of their perspectives for political and social life?source..
Compare and contrast Machiavelli and Wollstonecraft’s views on the meaning of virtue. What are the implications of their perspectives for political and social life?
Date of Submission
Virtue has its origin in the medieval times of Aristotle. The word is derived from Latin virtus, which denotes the attributes of a desirable man. Aristotle once posed the question as to whether the virtue of a sound citizen and the virtue of a good man should be regarded the same. Thomas Aquinas, on the other hand, commended that a good citizen can lack the quality of virtue. Political virtue is juxtaposed with the religious meaning of virtue and includes ruthlessness, strength, civic humanism, bravery, and pride. It is Francesco Guicciardini who rediscovered the classical version of political virtue in the perspective of safeguarding and preserving the independence of the city-state.
To Machiavelli, the prince or war leader had to have such political virtues as leadership, valor, and a sense of skill. He juxtaposed political virtue with moral virtue by stating that what was good for the state and for the leader may not also be good in the religious and moral sense. Mary Wollstonecraft’s conception of virtue is that virtue can only exist where there is well-developed knowledge. Therefore, whereas Machiavelli’s idea of virtue is anchored on bravery, valor and leadership, Wollstonecraft’s conception of virtue is anchored on knowledge. This paper will compare and contrast Wollstonecraft’s and Machiavelli’s conceptions of virtue and their implications on political and social life.
- HIGHER LEVEL TEACHING ASSISTANT. Psychology Essay.Description: Continuous Professional development is important in teaching and learning among HLTA. Some of the effects include that CPD builds the confidence of the teacher and their credibility in their work, enabling them to deliver efficiently (Vonk 2018). ...1 page/≈275 words| 1 Source | Harvard | Psychology | Essay |
- Explain The Major Theories Of Cognitive And Moral DevelopmentsDescription: Cognitive development is the psychological and neurological study of development of a child in terms of perception, conception and information processing. Interaction between the nervous system and brain with the environment is what contributes to cognitive development....6 pages/≈1650 words| 4 Sources | Harvard | Psychology | Essay |
- Friendship Between Heterosexual Men And Women ResearchDescription: The Task Was To Come Up With An Essay Discussing Whether Straight Men And Women Can Be Friend With No Strings Attached...3 pages/≈825 words| 3 Sources | Harvard | Psychology | Essay |