Rene Descartes And His Perspective On God`s Existence (Essay Sample)
Rene Descartes is the last-born son of Jeanne and Joachim who lived in La Haye, France. He was born in the 16th century where he studied many courses under the philosophical, rhetoric and grammar classes while in La Fleche town. The courses dwelt mostly in the liberal arts which were also his discipline of interest. He grew up to be a prominent icon in the discipline of philosophy where he was referred to as the father of all nation after he refrained from the traditional models of philosophy. His philosophical work and arguements is based on physics, mathematical aspect, and his background theoretical knowledge which is evident in his work “medication on first philosophy” where he argues that the issue of God and mortality should not only be argued in theological aspect, but it can also be discussed using philosophical theory (1). He argues that the idea of people to have faith in the existence of God and eternal life is not enough to substantiate the evidence that can be used to assimilate theists into religion. The concept that he used to approach his work “medication on first philosophy” is that people can get to believe a situation or an object by first doubting its existence. However, Rene does not give his opinion or reason for his doubts so that he can remain firm in his belief about the existence of God and eternal life. In the article, Rene first defines about how he believes in his origin before giving his perspective on God`s existence.
Descartes method of universal doubt begins with the first meditation where he claims to have the concept that an individual can employ to attain a firm decision in the field of science basing on the diversity of knowledge (6). He argues that even though he may now something or have an idea about someone, he should not reject others idea by stating that they are false but rather avoid having faith in thins or situation whose origin cannot be traced or are not certain. Descartes work on meditation is based more on skeptics because he concentrates on doubting the existing knowledge rather than rejecting his knowledge (6). He understands the knowledge of a situation or an idea by determining its need for doubt and certainty. He establishes certainty by first doubting his belief about what is existing or others perception of the same situation. Doubt and certainty are two parallel things that cannot go hand in hand with each other, so the moment that Descartes doubt a belief means that the knowledge is not certain.
Many philosophers working in line with Descartes highly criticized his work on meditation and his idea of understanding knowledge. The philosophers argued that Descartes over did his work on knowledge, he ought not to have doubted the existing work of other philosophers which were framed according to the traditional philosophy. He over raised the standards of knowledge to the extreme levels that could be accepted by the philosophers such as Socrates. According to Descartes, his idea about knowledge was so firm and certain that could not be doubted or questioned by anyone or even the prominent philosopher. He argued that if the knowledge is true, then it is automatic that the belief is true and accurate. However, the concept seems to work in the first section of his work on meditation, but towards the end of the meditation, Descartes claims that he has the idea of what is clear and distinct about knowledge (7). Descartes does not give his stand about his beliefs. He contradicts himself when he agrees that an idea is prone to doubts and mistakes but depending on clarity and making distinct clarification we can attain a certain idea. The issue of clarity and distinction of an idea is evident when he argues that what happens when he is sleeping does not appear clear or distinct. However, he later thinks about the situation in which he finds out that what he experiences while sleeping are all deceptions and there is no clear evidence revealing the difference between sleep and wakefulness.
The idea about certainty in Descartes work on meditation was also criticized by the same philosophers who criticized his idea about knowledge. The philosopher claimed that the idea of Descartes on certainty is more of psychology than philosophy because he only believes in what is certain and free from doubts or questions. They argued that it is not necessarily true that all that his believe are certain, clear, or distinct. Human beings are all prone to error, and anyone can make mistakes in his or her thinking
- Logical ArgumentDescription: Our lives are full of choices and decisions about what to believe. Each one of us prefers to believe what is true we do not always agree on what is actually true...2 pages/≈550 words| No Sources | MLA | Religion & Theology | Essay |
- Rama and Achilles Research Assignment PaperDescription: The story of Rama is about a young man who was chased away together with his brother Lakshman to live in the forest by their step mother ...3 pages/≈825 words| 2 Sources | MLA | Religion & Theology | Essay |
- Describe Relationship Between Popular Culture And ReligionDescription: The essay is about identifying the difference between the popular culture and the religion. Explain about the influence of the popular culture to the religion...1 page/≈275 words| 6 Sources | MLA | Religion & Theology | Essay |