Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
20 pages/≈5500 words
Sources:
25 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 39.95
Topic:

Advantages And Disadvatgaes Of Recently Implemented Cerner System (Research Paper Sample)

Instructions:

please send a detailed outline of what sections you will be working on for this before you start the paper. attached is what needs to be included

source..
Content:
NAME INSTRUCTOR TASK DATE Table of Contents TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u a.Abstract PAGEREF _Toc518745316 \h 2b.Background PAGEREF _Toc518745317 \h 3c.Methodology PAGEREF _Toc518745318 \h 4d.Cerner Technology and Impacts PAGEREF _Toc518745319 \h 8Patient Outcomes PAGEREF _Toc518745320 \h 8Nurses outcomes PAGEREF _Toc518745321 \h 8Nurses Satisfaction PAGEREF _Toc518745322 \h 8e.EHR implementation perspective and perception PAGEREF _Toc518745323 \h 9f.EHR implementation outcomes. PAGEREF _Toc518745324 \h 101.Positive outcomes PAGEREF _Toc518745325 \h 10Significant Reduction in Medical errors PAGEREF _Toc518745326 \h 11Standardized care PAGEREF _Toc518745327 \h 11Improved care delivery PAGEREF _Toc518745328 \h 12Enhanced superiority of care PAGEREF _Toc518745329 \h 13Cost savings PAGEREF _Toc518745330 \h 132.Negative Outcomes PAGEREF _Toc518745331 \h 13Unexpected costs. PAGEREF _Toc518745332 \h 13Physician dissatisfaction. PAGEREF _Toc518745333 \h 14Workflow interruptions. PAGEREF _Toc518745334 \h 14g.EHR Achievements PAGEREF _Toc518745335 \h 14i.Study Strengths and Limitations of the research PAGEREF _Toc518745336 \h 17j.Findings PAGEREF _Toc518745337 \h 18k.Discussion PAGEREF _Toc518745338 \h 20l.Conclusion PAGEREF _Toc518745339 \h 24m.References PAGEREF _Toc518745340 \h 25 * Abstract The drive of this particular study was to assess nurse’s views on the use of a recently implemented Cerner system February 1st at the Salt Lake regional hospital. With countrywide ongoing reports of a high prevalence in the care faults and healthcare-related infections, there was a serious prerequisite to look for outcomes related with employing Cerner Electronic Health Record (EHR) system as well as nurse’s views on Cerner technology implementation. All these discoveries are vital urgencies for those who make policies at the hospital, clinical administrators, and any other health correlated organizations. If all healthcare facilities are to attain the patient wants, by providing cost-effective care that is patient-centered, produce results that are of quality, and hold skilled nursing staff with effective communication and have a common clinical patient information are paramount. For this study, a cross-sectional perspective plan was used. The Information was collected for a period of 3 to 4 months after the original plan of Cerner system was implemented. Every nurse on each unit at the Salt Lake regional hospital was engaged to complete a two and half page survey on the entire shifts. Candy, pens and other survey materials were availed to the nurses to help increase the number of participants. The survey had 20 tasks and used a simple type of scale questions for the interview. 18 nurses completed the survey, recording a response rate of around 72%. Out of the 18 respondents, averagely, the worked time per week was found to be 18.8 (SD 7.98) hours. With most nurses who were participating and working full time being found to be (84.2%) and fifty-eight percent (58%) worked during day shift. In respect to computer literate nurses or those who had computer knowledge, they recorded an average score of 6.58 (SD .82) using a scale of 1 to 10, from 1 for those who never used it to 6 in preference to the expert users. Majority of the feedback was in the middle point on the simple scale with the cut of 10. An average score of 4.57 (SD 2.07) for the nurses on whether Cerner improves production on a scale of 2 to 6. Cerner reduced patient care mistakes by an average score of 6.65 (SD 2.63). In total, the average score that satisfied the Cerner system was 4.01 (SD 1.63). Most nurses at the Salt Lake Regional Medical Center are not satisfied with the Cerner Electronic Health Record (EHR) system in various aspects, this might be as a result of the strain to work with the new Cerner system. * Background The findings of this research were crucial priorities to the policy makers at the Salt Lake regional hospital, clinical managers, and any other healthcare related organization for, if services from the health care facilities were to meet the patient needs, provide a cost-effective patient-centered care, produce high-quality results, and to retain a highly expert nursing staff with good communication and shared clinical patient information should be dominant. Now that electronic health records (EHR) is defined to be a real-time, point-of-care, patient-centric data resource for clinicians that denotes a major field of health information technology and lie at the core of IT implementation plans in health care schemes around the world and the promise of progressive technology to change healthcare is ongoing. Of late, an Electronic health record (EHR) has been well-defined to be a longitudinal electronic database of patient health information, produced by patients’ visitation’s medical records in one or more care situations. The electronic health record database entails: patient data such as problem list, orders, medications, vital signs, past medical history, notes, laboratory tests and results, radiology reports, and any other medical relevant information about the patient. The Electronic health records (EHR) creates a comprehensive record of a clinical patient come across or an incident of upkeep and supports of care-related events like decision making, quality supervision, and clinical report on a patient or client. Following the national ongoing reports of a high prevalence of health-care errors and healthcare-associated infections, there has been a serious necessity to classify outcomes related with implementing Cerner Electronic Health Record (EHR) system plus employee’s perspectives on the current Cerner technology implementation. These discoveries are vital priorities for the Salt Lake regional hospital policy makers, clinical managers, and the hospital organization. If Salt Lake Regional Medical Center healthcare services are to ascertain the patient wants, provide a cost-effective patient-centered care, produce high-quality results, hold expert nursing staff, operative communication, and collective clinical patient data that is important. The technology was implemented to look for ways to improve employee and patient satisfaction, employee engagement and of course seeking aid into the pursuit for excellent patient outcomes at Salt Lake Regional Medical Center. There has been a skirmish on how to integrate technology into a daily workflow that does not hinder or disrupt nursing processes. The problem is not the lack of data, the problem for clinicians is getting easy access to the data that one can act upon. Customarily, health data is being stored in different places and shelves, in different formats inside the Cerner Electronic Health Record (EHR). Technology can now capture and store data and integrate with other systems to deliver the correct information at the right time to make decisions that impact operational, clinical and monetary outcomes. * Methodology Only survey method was used to learn about Cerner EHR technology and its impact on patient outcomes and staff satisfaction. To increase efficiency of the methodology; • Chocolate and pens and other stuffs were given to the nurses to encouragement them for participation. This was basically intended to reduce any inconveniences and enable the nurses to fill the questionnaires provided to them. • The survey had 20 items and used a simple scale question. 25 and 18 nurses completed the nurse satisfaction survey Survey questions: choose the box that utmost nearly defines how you feel about the following declarations: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral disagree Strongly disagree Cerner has improved my overall competence. Cerner has been hard for me to learn on how to use. EHR improves quality and client safety.  I am in an age where i must exchange data electronically with others and EHR can help to do this Health care system is complex without access to clinical decision support from EHR. 6. EHR and are not as secure as paper records. 7.Cerner improves my productivity. 8.Overally, I am satisfied with Cerner system. What is your rating on EHR transition: Worse than Expected Poor Acceptable Good Better than Expected a. Technical support b. ease of users c. Reliability d. Training e. response time identify any additional help you would like and give any other comments NO YES Description a. Template changes b. Computer navigation c. Changes to decision support rules Other questions (optional) YES NO If other specify Do you presently work Full Time, Part Time How many hours of training did you receive for Cerner Implementation? or PRN? How long have you been an employee at Salt Lake Regional? What changes would you make to Cerner? * Cerner Technology and Impacts Patient Outcomes Electronic health records usage has helped the progression and development of creative solutions to patient problems. The Cerner system gathers, analyses and retrieve a wide range of patient information giving a bridge of comparing another patient information. The ease access and retrieval of patient information by the nurses, has enabled patients acquire better medical services. EHRs has improved the ability to update information, analyze illnesses and minimize medical faults that were previously encountered. accurate records access Nurses outcomes Through the survey conducted,15% of the staff and nurses were dissatisfied with EHR system arguing that the employment of the high technology may lead to negative results such as; Their computer illiteracy would resul...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!