Evaluating the Impact of System Design and Realisation on System Lifecycle Success (Research Paper Sample)

Evaluating the Impact of System Design and Realisation on System Lifecycle Success Student Name University’s Name Professor’s Name Course Date Introduction System Design and Realisation is a postgraduate coursework specification that aims to prepare students to evaluate and critique the system engineering activities connected with the Design and Realisation phases of the life-cycle of an existing system, to propose changes to existing approaches, and to develop suitable system design and realization approaches for new projects. This essay will focus on the introduction of system design and realization and the associated topics. System Engineering is a discipline that applies principles, practices, and techniques from various engineering disciplines to the design, development, integration, and operation of complex systems. This can involve a broad range of activities, from creating strategies to their deployment and retirement and developing tools and methods to their validation and evaluation. This essay will explore the activities associated with the System Design and Realisation process and the various methods and techniques used for this purpose. The System Design and Realisation process can be divided into two distinct phases: Design and Realisation. During the Design phase, various system requirements are identified and analyzed, and a design solution is proposed. During the Realisation phase, the design is implemented, and the system is tested and deployed. Both degrees must be managed effectively and efficiently to ensure that the system meets the desired objectives. The essay will begin by discussing the goals and objectives of the System Design and Realisation process and the associated activities. The tools and techniques used for this process will then be addressed, and the importance of integrating various disciplines to achieve a successful system design and realization process will be highlighted. The essay will then focus on the challenges associated with the System Design and Realisation process and the techniques used to overcome them. Finally, the article will conclude by summarising the key points discussed and highlighting the importance of an effective System Design and Realisation process. Question 1: System Architecture and Analysis Process for Identifying and Selecting Preferred Design Alternatives Systems of Interest (SOI) development is complex, requiring various skills, tools, and processes to identify and select a preferred design alternative successfully. This essay will explore the system architecture and analysis process that is effective for SOI development and will discuss the impact of including off-the-shelf (OTS) items as significant parts of the proposed system. The system architecture and analysis process begins with defining the system's goals and objectives and developing a system-level view of the system's components and their interrelationships (Braun et al., 2022). This process includes the identification of the system's technical requirements and constraints, the definition of system performance measures, and the selection of appropriate development processes. Once the system architecture and analysis process is complete, the system's design can begin. When designing a system of interest, the system architecture and analysis process must consider the system's performance, cost, and through life support concerns. Performance considerations include the system's operational requirements, such as reliability, availability, maintainability, safety, security, and scalability. Cost considerations include the system’s total cost of ownership (TCO), which reflects the system’s initial purchase cost, ongoing maintenance costs, and replacement costs. Through life support considerations include the system’s ability to meet user needs, its supportability and maintainability, and its ability to be upgraded and replaced. Once the system architecture and analysis process is complete, the system's design can begin. In order to identify and select a preferred design alternative, system-level analysis techniques, such as cost-benefit analysis, risk analysis, decision analysis, and life-cycle cost analysis, can be used to assess the system's performance, cost, and through life support concerns. This analysis can help identify design alternatives that meet the system's performance, cost, and through life support requirements. In addition to system-level analysis techniques, the design of a system of interest can also be aided by using off-the-shelf (OTS) components. OTS components can improve system design by providing a cost-effective and reliable solution to system requirements. OTS components can also help reduce the time and effort required to design and develop a system of interest, as they are typically already tested and certified (M'manga et al., 2017). Using OTS components can reduce the system's total cost of ownership (TCO) and the time and effort required to design and develop the system. However, the use of OTS components also has some potential drawbacks. OTS components may not meet all of the system's requirements and may not be compatible with other system components. Additionally, using OTS components may limit the system's ability to be upgraded or replaced. In conclusion, the system architecture and analysis process is essential to successful SOI development. This process must consider the system's performance, cost, and life support concerns to identify and select a preferred design alternative. OTS components can help reduce the cost and time required to design and develop a system of interest but must be carefully considered to ensure that the system meets the system's performance, cost, and life support requirements. Question 2: This essay aims to identify and discuss the factors that impact the achievement of through-life support arrangements (quantities and kinds of resources required) that may result in a system, as deployed, consuming significantly different quantities of inputs than was predicted during system development. This essay will examine the challenges experienced by system designers and acquirers in determining what is needed to support the deployed System of Interest (SoI) if its uses may be significantly different, or in a different environment, than was initially anticipated in the system development. Systems engineering is a critical component in developing successful systems, as it is responsible for the design and realization of the system. System design and realization is a complex process that requires a comprehensive understanding of the system, its environment, and the resources needed to support the system over its life cycle (M'manga et al., 2017). As such, system designers and acquirers must consider all the variables that may impact the system's life support arrangements. One of the key challenges experienced by system designers and acquirers is the difficulty in accurately predicting the resources needed to support the system once it is deployed. This is because many variables, such as the system's use, its environment, and the resources available during its life cycle, may differ significantly from what was anticipated in the initial system development. As such, system designers and acquirers must consider many factors when determining the resources required to support the system over its life cycle. The first factor to consider is the system's physical and operational environment. Different environments require different resources to support the system. For instance, the resources needed to support a system deployed in a highly populated urban area may be significantly different from those needed to support a system deployed in a remote rural area (Zhang, 2018). The system’s environment must also be taken into account when determining the system’s use. Different uses may require different resources to support the system. The second factor to consider is the system's use. The system's use must be considered when determining the resources needed to support the system over its life cycle. Different uses may require different resources to support the system. For example, a system used for data collection may require different resources than a system used for communication. The third factor to consider is the resources available to the system during its life cycle. Depending on available resources, different resources may be required to support the system. For instance, a system with access to a reliable power source may require fewer resources than a system without access to a reliable power source. The fourth factor to consider is the system's life cycle. Different life cycles may require different resources to support the system. For instance, a system with a long life cycle may require more resources than a short one. In conclusion, system designers and acquirers must consider many factors when determining the resources required to support the system over its life cycle. These factors include the system's environment, use, available resources during its life cycle, and the system's life cycle. As such, system designers and acquirers must be aware of the potential for the system's through-life support arrangements to differ significantly from what was initially anticipated in the system development. Question 3: Validation of System Maintenance and Maintainability: Limitations, Affordances, and Implications Validation is a process used to ensure that a system meets its requirements and specifications. This process is essential for a system's successful development, deployment, and maintenance. Maintenance and maintainability of a system are two essential aspects of validation. The limits and benefits of various techniques of validating a system's maintenance and ease of maintenance will be covered in this article, along with how these advantages and disadvantages affect the development of th...