Abortion Policies in Florida (Essay Sample)

Abortion Policy
Student name
Institution
Course Code: Course Name
Date
Introduction
Abortion is induced terminating pregnancy; it is one of most the utmost debatable encounters in the legitimate dialogue. Among the existing literature that validates the context of abortion is intensive research conducted by Kirkman et al. (2017). The findings argue that induced abortion is; deliberated because of notion during cancer treatment, life-saver after breast cancer analysis, a current foundation of grief, and the root of breast cancer. Additionally, the author argues that a healthcare professional executes the process to let go of the prenatal period. The United States had revised the law on the focus in Florida in1973. At the same time, in July 2013, the Texas legislature passed the United States' restrictive trap bylaws, the constituents of the law had been carried out by November 2013. Although most residents looked forward to the decision made about women's rights on abortion to establish peace, the decision became symbolic of the battlefield in legal and ethical issues that bear to being disputed. This study focuses on abortion policies overriding the states of Florida and states of Texas, particularly how religious, moral, and ethical variations are interweaved in the abortion case; however, a great deal of emphasis will be on the differences and certain similarities in the governments and reviews on implementing the policies and the statistics to bring the study into proper perspective.
Abortion Policies in Florida
Georgia has one of the country's highest maternal death rates. In Georgia, maternal death rates are rising, with black moms bearing the burden of death. Statistics show that more than forty percent of the wanted pregnancies are later turned out to be unwanted. Georgie has the highest teen birth rate compared to the national average. As a result, the school put more emphasis on condoms than on other forms of contraceptives. Induced abortion is a statutory law in Florida. These findings are supported by Nash et al. (2019) argues that governing bodies have legislated strategies that look after abortion services. The findings indicate that supporters of abortion are firm on the lookout for giving the U.S Superlative Court several human rights for honored legitimate defenses to those on the lookout for an abortion. The findings point out how the government is reassuring on the interest and choices of pregnant women.
According to prochoicegeorgia.org the state of Georgia has more than twenty health facilities that offer abortions. As at 2014, only four percent of all the counties’ health facilities could offer abortions. In an attempt to make abortion unnecessary, the state formulated certain laws such as mandated counseling and waiting periods and more information to justify the action. Abortion has not been grounded on religion. Despite the aspects contributing to the debate, it seems ethical, and a decent ground assertively does not support the debate on forbidding or legalizing the case (Allsbrook, 2021). Religious opponents don't recommend the legalization of unborn rights, some perceive abortion to be getting rid of an innocent's child life thus cannot tolerate this act. Similarly, (Frohwirth et al.,2018). Through qualitative research on women, findings showed religion to conquer abortion degradation indicators. On the other hand, some allies prioritize the expectant's women's interests and decide on terminating the child while the unborn child's life is unvalued. The study noted in irrespective of the religion, most residents in Florida are supportive of the legalization of abortion.
However, the Supreme Court advocated limitations on abortion. Based on an article published by the American Academy of Pediatrics (2017) appraises these assertions, claiming that there is a reinstated indication in the state of Florida advocating on parental approval for an abortion. Also, the young people might have sailed across inevitabilities to make known to their parents while pursuing an abortion. For instance, according to Allsbrook ,(2021) links the restrictions with treatment obstacles in assertion hence holding them back from access to abortion. Also, the author states that lack of adequate resources has led the care to be expensive, with the regular overheads alternating from $400 to $550 for a clinical abortion done at ten weeks and $1,100 to $1,650 for abortion care done at 20 to 21 weeks.
Additionally, some patients have traveling expenses increasing the cost of the whole procedure. The latter states that limitations on certain reasons discriminated some women residing in the states from the abortion care. Both the disabled and black women are denied legal sovereignty on health care resolutions intended to demoralize abortion access. The restrictions decrease the number of abortions in the state. Interested victims on terminating unintended pregnancies included both women and adolescents. In Florida, there were approximately 71,050 of abortions in 2017, equivalent to 20.6 of 1000 women during their reproductive period. However, the rate is10% decrease in 2014 at a rate of 18.6%. Abortions in Florida exemplified 8% of folks in the States of Florida. The abortion rate in Florida is high.
Abortion policies in Texas
Texas, being a predominantly conservative state, has a long and difficult history of opposing the federal government, and abortion is no exception.Gov. Greg Abbott signed State Bill 22, which prohibits the use of taxpayer-funded and, as a result, municipal resources to collaborate with abortion providers, and House Bill 16, which prohibits doctors who do not offer medical attention. Induced abortion is a health issue distressing Texas due to restrictive abortion laws in the ruling. According to Baum et al. (2016) the study argues that Texas executed abortion restrictions and House Bill 2 within a short period hence, the medical facilities subsidiary to abortion lessened. These findings are strongly apprehensive of the lives of pregnant women.
The state also formulated laws that prevent unnecessary abortions. For instance, it requires a pregnant woman to prove she has undergone two visits and, if she is a minor, she must have guardian consent. Religions are involved in abortion. In Texas, induced abortion is religiously considered illegal unless the life of the mother is in danger. Frohwirth et Al. (2018) researched the validation of abortion. The findings indicated that women pursue out abortion or abortion specialists, regardless of the commandments. Additionally, the author states that Christians had high chances of being certain of abortion may save pregnant women's lives, unlike Muslims. According to the author, advocates on abortion civil liberties were generally those who habitually attended ecclesiastical services, unlike individuals who hardly ever showed- up in the services. However, the study proves religion to be associated with the pennant’s choice for proceeding with an abortion.
The teenaged and women of all ages are involved in the act. Research conducted by Arisukwu et al. (2019) indicated that in Texas, both adolescents and women get into undesirable pregnancies bringing about termination of the pregnancy despite the barriers they come across. The gauged undesirable prenatal period ratio was 59 per 1000 females aged 15-49, and 56% of them decided on abortion, which is extra with 50% of abortion connected mortality (Bankole et al.2015). According to research conducted by Oyeyipo et al. (2020), Texas has record targets in unwanted gestations at tender ages and in certain portions of the nation-state is 80%. The later findings stress on women with an unwanted pregnancy to be 28%. In contrast, women of procreative age with attempted abortion are 14%, and approximately 10% of them ought to terminate the prenatal period. However, most women carried on with the act since they are not yet united, with scarcity, lack of plans on babies, or the need for tutoring.
Differences & Similarities in States
Both states legalized abortion of pregnancies. According to the research, different authors conclude that the governing bodies in both states support abortion's rights; then enacted laws. Moreover, both states consider the expectant's woman choices and interests and the pregnant adolescent's decisions. However, it seems the life of the unborn is usually considered only when the pregnancy is not in a critical condition. Additionally, both states women and adolescents are involved. Based on the studies conducted on gender incidences in both states are certain findings which are both expressed in figures. For instance, in both states, the rates of women are determined per 1000. Additionally, the rate of women in their productive period and among women whose interests were abortion were determined in both states and expressed as percentages. The religious perception of abortion in State of Texas differed from the State of Florida. According to believers' attitude in Texas, Christians believed in saving lives through abortion but otherwise for the Islamic religion. However, in Florida, no religious believers are advocating for abortion rights. The act is to been performed irrespective of religion.
Effectiveness
When the termination procedure is been performed in suitable situations, the act could be effective and safe. However, when the women have challenges in costs or lack qualified health care professionals, it results in unsafe procedures (Cameron et al., 2018).
Demographic Differences
This section outlines the statistics on demography in both states on women whose interests are abortion. Based on the previous studies, a fairly accurate ...